DomainFinder
Sections
Home page
Documentation
Download
Useful links
 
See also
Python home page
MMTK home page
 
Contact
hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr

Python Powered
  

Examples

This section presents some examples that show what you can do with DomainFinder. It is rather small at the moment - check again later to see more examples!

The images on this page are kept small to speed up downloading. By clicking on the images, you can get a full-size version.

Lactoferrin

Lactoferrin is a protein with a particularly clear domain structure; you can see the domains just by looking at the protein. It is thus a good example for showing the ideal outcome of a domain analysis. The example uses the open form of lactoferrin, PDB entry 1LFH.


With 691 residues, lactoferrin is a mid-size protein. To find the domain structure, 100 normal modes would be sufficient, but 200 have been chosen because the computational cost is negligible. Note that DomainFinder has slightly increased this number to 222 for implementational reasons.

Four modes have been selected for the analysis. Two or three would have been reasonable choices as well, but there is little reason to use just the first and not the second, because the frequencies are very similar.

The deformation threshold has been set to 600, about the average deformation energy of the modes. The domain coarseness of 15 was found after some experimentation.


The deformation energy distribution already shows three particularly rigid regions (the blue ones), which are the cores of the dynamical domains. As expected, the hinge region shows the highest flexibility. There is a continuous transition between the low-deformation cores and the high-deformation hinge, which shows that clean-cut domain delimitations do not exist.

The deformation histogram is typical for a protein with well-defined domains: a peak at low deformations corresponding to the mostly rigid domains, and a fast decrease for higher deformation energy values.


The three domains come out as expected. The motion parameter plot shows that the motions of the three domains are indeed well separated, and that the parameters within one domain are very similar, at least for the first two modes. In the third and fourth mode, the bands corresponding to the domains widen, but do not split into subbands. This means that the domains do not split into subdomains at higher frequencies, but move with a higher overall deformation.


The red domain in more detail. The plot at the bottom shows the similarity of each part of the domain relative to the two parts which are most similar to each other. This is the ratio used for defining the domain coarseness. In this domain, the most dissimilar part requires a coarseness of 13 to be included in the domain, i.e. if the coarseness were lowered to a value below 13, one part would fall out of the domain. The remaining ones are much more similar; the next highest coarseness values is five.

The residue list on the right shows the residues that are colored red. This is not a precise definition of the domain, but rather a list of sufficiently many residues to describe the domain. Other residues might have similar motion parameters and hence belong to the domain, but are not included because of the arbitrary division of the protein into cubic parts. This is not a problem because domains are large and not precisely defined, whereas the wrongly eliminated residues are always few in number.